Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Vivo X200 FE

Verdict

Apple iPhone 16 Pro scores higher on the OH Rank (69 vs 68), winning 2 of 10 categories including Performance and Video. Vivo X200 FE is 0.3mm wider than Apple iPhone 16 Pro. Vivo X200 FE is the more recent release, from Jul 2025.

Score Breakdown

Category

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

71.5mm (2.81in) · Sep 2024 · Rank #93

Vivo X200 FE

71.8mm (2.83in) · Jul 2025 · Rank #105
Performance /15
11
7
Battery /15
6
11
Screen /15
13
13
IP Protection /15
12
12
Main Camera /15
12
12
Selfie /5
5
5
Video /5
5
3
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
5
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
0
TOTAL
69
68
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
71.5mm (2.81in) · Sep 2024 · Rank #93
11+6+13+12+12+5+5+0+5+0 = 69
* TOP Selfie* TOP Software

EDITORIAL: The small version of iPhone 16 Pro Max is a technological marvel (with a less-than-a-day battery life). It offers outstanding video recoding, top processor, screen and a camera like iPhone 16 Pro Max but trades battery endurance for a one hand size. The new camera control button may be just a gimmick but some of the Apple AI tricks have arrived at the end of October and help make 2024 iPhones that much better.

PROs
smooth A18 Pro chip performance, >1700nits bright (460ppi) LTPO OLED with Dolby Vision, up to 6m of water submersion, the 16 Pro Max matching camera setup: 48MP main and 12MP tele with OIS and PDAF plus a 48MP PDAF ultrawide, a 12MP OIS PDAF Selfie and up to 6 years of updates of already very mature iOS
CONs
lack of innovation in recent years, disappointing AI effort, barely a day of battery endurance, >90min 45W slow battery charging (25W wireless), lack of expandable storage, no Desktop replacement software
Vivo X200 FE
71.8mm (2.83in) · Jul 2025 · Rank #105
7+11+13+12+12+5+3+0+5+0 = 68
FLY* TOP Software* TOP Selfie

EDITORIAL: 8 months after X200 Pro Mini here comes another compact Vivo. Along with Oppo and Xiaomi, Vivo is now clearly after Apple's compact phones profits. This phone looks and feels similar to iPhones falling somewhere in between iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 but delivering clean Android, much better battery life and faster charging.

PROs
very good build, fast Dimensity 9300+ with UFS3.1 performance, >36hr endurance from a 6500mAh Si-C battery with sub-60min fast 90W wired charging, bright >1700nits HDR10+ LTPO AMOLED screen, IP69 element protection, great photos from the 50MP 23mm PDAF main + 50MP 70mm OIS PDAF periscope telephoto (but not) 8MP 15mm ultrawide camera, excellent selfies from a 50MP AF unit, up to 4 years of OS updates
CONs
no AF on the 8MP ultrawide, no expandable storage, no desktop replacement feature, slow USB-C 2.0 port with no video out

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.