Google Pixel 10 vs (Xiaomi) Poco F8 Ultra
Verdict
Google Pixel 10 and (Xiaomi) Poco F8 Ultra tie on the OH Rank at a score of 67. Google Pixel 10 wins on Screen and Selfie; (Xiaomi) Poco F8 Ultra wins on Performance and Battery. (Xiaomi) Poco F8 Ultra is 5.8mm wider than Google Pixel 10. (Xiaomi) Poco F8 Ultra is the more recent release, from Nov 26, 2025.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
67
67
Google Pixel 10
72mm (2.83in) · Aug 28, 2025 · Rank #116
9+7+13+12+9+5+4+0+5+3 = 67
* TOP Selfie* TOP SoftwareMidrange
EDITORIAL: New vanilla Pixel comes with faster UFS (but only on a 256GB version) and a proper 5x tele lens on the back. The rest is (as we're growing to expect from Google) similar: mediocre Tensor performance, short battery endurance with very slow charging, very bright (tho non-LTPO) screen, decent imaging performance (from the main and ultrawide lenses that are actually downgraded) and exceptional software experience with a industry leading 7 years of OS updates promise.
PROs
flagship build, bright 2000nits 422ppi 120Hz OLED screen with HDR10+, IP68 protection, reliable 48MP 25mm main + 10.8MP 112mm telefoto + 13MP ~13mm ultrawide (all 3 PDAF) setup, excellent 10.5MP 20mm PDAF selfie, good video recording, OS loaded with AI and other features and a up to 7 years of updates promise, basic desktop replacement functionality and Satellite SOS Service in some markets
CONs
midrange Tensor G5 processor with UFS 4.0 (3.1 on 128GB version) performance, just a day of endurance from a 4970mAh battery with 90min slow 30W (15W wireless) charging, no memory expansion slot, limited market availability, expensive for it's hardware
(Xiaomi) Poco F8 Ultra
77.8mm (3.06in) · Nov 26, 2025 · Rank #114
13+11+11+12+9+3+3+0+5+0 = 67
EDITORIAL: Another Ultra phone from Poco brings updates but also some downgrades to excellent F7 Ultra. F8 Ultra advantage of being a cheap flagship phone is fading with higher pricing and exposing it to last year’s best phones of the same price. Still, it offers top processor with fastest memory, great endurance and screen (tho non-LTPO) and solid performance main and periscope tele cameras. Bose partnered to create the first 2.1 sound on a phone – standard two channels that add a woofer speaker located in the camera island. It produces excellent sound.
PROs
top SD 8 Elite Gen 5 with UFS4.1 performance, 36hr battery endurance from 6500mAh battery with sub-60min 100W (40W wireless) charging, good sub-420ppi AMOLED with Dolby Vision (tho non-LTPO and with sub-1100nits brightness), IP68 protection. many great pics from 50MP 23mm OIS PDAF main + 50MP 115mm PDAF periscope telephoto + 50MP 18mm ultrawide back cameras, up to 5 years of OS updates, fast USB-C 3.2 port with OTG and Display Out and excellent sound co-designed with Bose
CONs
almost 3mm wider then F7 Ultra, heavier too, poor performance under prolonged maximum load (gets very hot too). mediocre 32MP 21mm selfie, mediocre video recording, no expandable memory, lacking in advanced AI tricks competitors have and no desktop replacement functionality
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.