(Vivo) IQOO 13 vs Vivo X200 FE

Verdict

(Vivo) IQOO 13 scores higher on the OH Rank (69 vs 68), winning 2 of 10 categories including Performance and Screen. (Vivo) IQOO 13 is 4.9mm wider than Vivo X200 FE. Vivo X200 FE is the more recent release, from Jul 2025.

Score Breakdown

Category

(Vivo) IQOO 13

76.7mm (3.02in) · Nov 8, 2024 · Rank #91

Vivo X200 FE

71.8mm (2.83in) · Jul 2025 · Rank #105
Performance /15
11
7
Battery /15
11
11
Screen /15
15
13
IP Protection /15
12
12
Main Camera /15
9
12
Selfie /5
3
5
Video /5
3
3
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
5
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
0
TOTAL
69
68
(Vivo) IQOO 13
76.7mm (3.02in) · Nov 8, 2024 · Rank #91
11+11+15+12+9+3+3+0+5+0 = 69
FLY* TOP Screen* TOP Software* TOP Gaming

EDITORIAL: As last year, Vivo's subbrand IQOO released it's top phone as soon as the best Snapdragon chip became available. This year there is no Pro model, just one amazing gaming powerhouse with a 6000+mAh Silicon Carbon battery that provides exceptional battery runtime. The screen is also outstanding, performing better than most flagships. If you can live with a good (but not great) cameras and you're okay with a phone this big - IQOO 13 (and OnePlus 13) should be at the top of your list.

PROs
SD 8 Elite processor and top performance scores, a 6150mAh Silicone Carbon battery with top battery endurance with very fast 120W wired (no wireless) charging, excellent 1800nits (>500ppi) LTPO AMOLED screen with HDR10+, IP69 water protection, good 50MP main + 50MP tele with OIS and PDAF + 50MP ultrawide with AF, light and fast Funtouch OS with 4 years of OS updates
CONs
big size, selfie with no AF, lack of expandable SDmemory storage and a lack of desktop replacement software
Vivo X200 FE
71.8mm (2.83in) · Jul 2025 · Rank #105
7+11+13+12+12+5+3+0+5+0 = 68
FLY* TOP Software* TOP Selfie

EDITORIAL: 8 months after X200 Pro Mini here comes another compact Vivo. Along with Oppo and Xiaomi, Vivo is now clearly after Apple's compact phones profits. This phone looks and feels similar to iPhones falling somewhere in between iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 but delivering clean Android, much better battery life and faster charging.

PROs
very good build, fast Dimensity 9300+ with UFS3.1 performance, >36hr endurance from a 6500mAh Si-C battery with sub-60min fast 90W wired charging, bright >1700nits HDR10+ LTPO AMOLED screen, IP69 element protection, great photos from the 50MP 23mm PDAF main + 50MP 70mm OIS PDAF periscope telephoto (but not) 8MP 15mm ultrawide camera, excellent selfies from a 50MP AF unit, up to 4 years of OS updates
CONs
no AF on the 8MP ultrawide, no expandable storage, no desktop replacement feature, slow USB-C 2.0 port with no video out

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.