Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold 5
Verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores higher on the OH Rank (73 vs 68), winning 3 of 10 categories including Performance and Main Camera. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is 1.4mm wider than Vivo X Fold 5. Vivo X Fold 5 is the more recent release, from Jul 2, 2025.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
73
68
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
74mm (2.91in) · Apr 25, 2025 · FOLD · Rank #53
11+8+13+12+12+5+4+0+3+5 = 73
FOLDFLY* TOP Selfie
EDITORIAL: Motorola's top foldable phone is the flip phone to beat: great package includes everything you need except for a limited battery life (which most foldables struggle with). This one has great build, submersible IP protection, excellent screens and a triple 50MP camera system that misses a tele lens but delivers great pics and very good videos.
PROs
great proportions and flagship build, great SD 8 Elite with UFS 4.0 performance, sub-60min 68W (30W wireless) charging, two excellent 165Hz 1500nits >400ppi LTPO AMOLED screens with Dolby Vision, (immersible) IP48 protection, excellent photos and selfies from 50MP 24mm OIS main + 50MP 12mm ultrawide (both with PDAF) setup, feature and AI tricks rich stock-Android-like HelloUI, desktop replacement functionality
CONs
heavy throttling under load, sub-24hr endurance from a smallish 4700mAh lithium battery, no expandable memory, only 3 years of OS updates, slow USB-C 2.0 port
Vivo X Fold 5
72.6mm (2.86in) · Jul 2, 2025 · FOLD · Rank #101
9+11+13+12+9+5+4+0+5+0 = 68
FOLD* TOP Selfie* TOP Software
EDITORIAL: Vivo is aiming for the very best with the X Fold 5. Fold 5 features the biggest battery yet on a foldable and offers excellent brightness on both screens. the back camera performance while good, it is not as good as you'd expect from Vivo.
PROs
excellent build, only 4.3mm thick when open, very good SnapDragon 8 Gen 3 with UFS 4.1 performance, sub-60min 80W wired (40W wireless) fast charging, 2 >1800nits bright LTPO AMOLED screens (the inner one has Dolby Vision too), IP59 protection, Zeiss branded 50MP 23mm OIS main + 50MP 70mm OIS periscope tele + 50MP 15mm ultrawide (all with PDAF) are great on paper but produce only above average images and videos (with limited dynamic range), good (not great) video recording quality, 4 years of OS updates and a fast USB-C 3.2 port with video out
CONs
1 year old processor, the 6000mAh Silicone Carbon battery should deliver better battery endurance, no AF on either 20MP selfie (but you'll use the main camera for selfies), no expandable memory, no desktop replacement software and limited market availability
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.