Motorola RAZR 70+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
Verdict
Motorola RAZR 70+ scores higher on the OH Rank (67 vs 62), winning 2 of 10 categories including Battery and Video. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 is 1.2mm wider than Motorola RAZR 70+. Motorola RAZR 70+ is the more recent release, from Apr 29, 2026.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
67
62
Motorola RAZR 70+
74mm (2.91in) · Apr 29, 2026 · FLIP · Rank #112
7+9+13+12+9+5+4+0+3+5 = 67
FLIP* TOP Selfie* TOP Desktop Replacement
EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-test listing based on a reasonable expectation of battery, charging, screen and imaging performance) Coming with a better processor, faster charging and brighter screens then vanilla Razr 70, the + version brings more RAM, better imaging and gaming in exchange for endurance, military standard impact protection and price. Still an all-around great foldable if you're happy with having to carry a charging brick.
PROs
very good build, very good SD 8s Gen 3 with UFS 4.0 performance, sub-30min fast 45W (15W wireless) charging, two >1300nits bright >410ppi 165Hz LTPO AMOLED screens with Dolby Vision, IP48 protection, very good pics from a 50MP 24mm OIS PDAF main + 50MP 12mm PDAF ultrawide (you can use for selfies too), pleasure to use stock-Android-like HelloUI with tons of useful features, full desktop replacement functionality (tho wireless only)
CONs
disappointing 4500mAh battery size with barely a full day endurance, main screen chunky bezels, average 32MP fixed focus selfie, average video recording, no expandable memory, just 3 years of OS updates, slow USB-C 2.0 port, limited market availability
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
75.2mm (2.96in) · Jul 25, 2025 · FLIP · Rank #156
7+6+13+12+9+5+0+0+5+5 = 62
FLIPFLY* TOP Software* TOP Desktop Replacement* TOP Selfie
EDITORIAL: For the first time, Samsung added DeX to a flip phone finally putting Flip line into it's flagship tier. Main camera takes lovely pics, portraits and selfies at both 1x and 2x. The phone grew 3mm in width, has a bigger (but lower rez) screen and a 300mAh battery size upgrade. Software is excellent, loaded with features and AI tricks and comes with industry leading "7 years of updates" promise. The processor is not quite flagship: Exynos 2500 struggles to compete with last year's Snapdragon and Mediatec top dogs. This is a great foldable if you're a Samsung fan or in a market with limited foldable phones choices.
PROs
flagship build, good Exynos 2500 with UFS 4.0 performance, 24hr endurance from a 4300mAh lithium battery, >1400nits bright 400ppi foldable LTPO AMOLED screen with HDR10+, IP48 protection, very good 50MP 23mm dual-pixel PDAF OIS main + underwhelming 12MP 13mm ultrawide setup, average 10MP 23mm selfie, uneven video recording quality, mature and feature packed OneUI with 7 years of OS updates, DeX software and a fast USB-C 3.2 with OTG
CONs
thinner than the 6 but still >13mm, painfully slow >90min 25W (15W wireless) charging, no AF on ultrawide or selfie, no expandable memory, weak stereo speaker setup
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.