Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Motorola RAZR 70+
Verdict
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores higher on the OH Rank (76 vs 67), winning 3 of 10 categories including Performance and Battery.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
76
67
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
74mm (2.91in) · Apr 29, 2026 · FLIP · Rank #28
11+11+13+12+12+5+4+0+3+5 = 76
FLIPSUPERIOR* TOP Selfie* TOP Desktop Replacement
EDITORIAL: With several downgrades from Razr 60 Ultra, this phone feels like a downgrade but still holds the "TOP Foldable" position. Great performance, long battery life, great screens and excellent imaging make this a flip phone to beat. Consider the last year's version for the same processor, brighter screens (and shorter battery life), better sound, same cameras and lower price.
PROs
upgraded hinge is now titanium, fast SD 8 Elite with UFS 4.0 performance, >30hr endurance from a 5000mAh battery with sub-50min 68W (30W wireless) charging, >1400nits (outer screen >1000nits) >410ppi 165Hz LTPO AMOLED screens with Dolby Vision and HDR10+, IP48 protection, excellent photos and selfies from a 50MP 22mm OIS main + 50MP 12mm ultrawide setup, good video recording, tons of software and AI features, desktop replacement functionality
CONs
throttling under heavy load, outer screen brightness is below 1100nits, no telephoto lens, no expandable storage, only 3 years of OS updates, slow USB-C 2.0 port, hard to find and pricey at lounch
Motorola RAZR 70+
74mm (2.91in) · Apr 29, 2026 · FLIP · Rank #112
7+9+13+12+9+5+4+0+3+5 = 67
FLIP* TOP Selfie* TOP Desktop Replacement
EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-test listing based on a reasonable expectation of battery, charging, screen and imaging performance) Coming with a better processor, faster charging and brighter screens then vanilla Razr 70, the + version brings more RAM, better imaging and gaming in exchange for endurance, military standard impact protection and price. Still an all-around great foldable if you're happy with having to carry a charging brick.
PROs
very good build, very good SD 8s Gen 3 with UFS 4.0 performance, sub-30min fast 45W (15W wireless) charging, two >1300nits bright >410ppi 165Hz LTPO AMOLED screens with Dolby Vision, IP48 protection, very good pics from a 50MP 24mm OIS PDAF main + 50MP 12mm PDAF ultrawide (you can use for selfies too), pleasure to use stock-Android-like HelloUI with tons of useful features, full desktop replacement functionality (tho wireless only)
CONs
disappointing 4500mAh battery size with barely a full day endurance, main screen chunky bezels, average 32MP fixed focus selfie, average video recording, no expandable memory, just 3 years of OS updates, slow USB-C 2.0 port, limited market availability
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.