Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
Verdict
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores higher on the OH Rank (76 vs 62), winning 4 of 10 categories including Performance and Battery. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 is 1.2mm wider than Motorola Razr 70 Ultra. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is the more recent release, from Apr 29, 2026.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
76
62
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
74mm (2.91in) · Apr 29, 2026 · FLIP · Rank #28
11+11+13+12+12+5+4+0+3+5 = 76
FLIPSUPERIOR* TOP Selfie* TOP Desktop Replacement
EDITORIAL: With several downgrades from Razr 60 Ultra, this phone feels like a downgrade but still holds the "TOP Foldable" position. Great performance, long battery life, great screens and excellent imaging make this a flip phone to beat. Consider the last year's version for the same processor, brighter screens (and shorter battery life), better sound, same cameras and lower price.
PROs
upgraded hinge is now titanium, fast SD 8 Elite with UFS 4.0 performance, >30hr endurance from a 5000mAh battery with sub-50min 68W (30W wireless) charging, >1400nits (outer screen >1000nits) >410ppi 165Hz LTPO AMOLED screens with Dolby Vision and HDR10+, IP48 protection, excellent photos and selfies from a 50MP 22mm OIS main + 50MP 12mm ultrawide setup, good video recording, tons of software and AI features, desktop replacement functionality
CONs
throttling under heavy load, outer screen brightness is below 1100nits, no telephoto lens, no expandable storage, only 3 years of OS updates, slow USB-C 2.0 port, hard to find and pricey at lounch
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
75.2mm (2.96in) · Jul 25, 2025 · FLIP · Rank #156
7+6+13+12+9+5+0+0+5+5 = 62
FLIPFLY* TOP Software* TOP Desktop Replacement* TOP Selfie
EDITORIAL: For the first time, Samsung added DeX to a flip phone finally putting Flip line into it's flagship tier. Main camera takes lovely pics, portraits and selfies at both 1x and 2x. The phone grew 3mm in width, has a bigger (but lower rez) screen and a 300mAh battery size upgrade. Software is excellent, loaded with features and AI tricks and comes with industry leading "7 years of updates" promise. The processor is not quite flagship: Exynos 2500 struggles to compete with last year's Snapdragon and Mediatec top dogs. This is a great foldable if you're a Samsung fan or in a market with limited foldable phones choices.
PROs
flagship build, good Exynos 2500 with UFS 4.0 performance, 24hr endurance from a 4300mAh lithium battery, >1400nits bright 400ppi foldable LTPO AMOLED screen with HDR10+, IP48 protection, very good 50MP 23mm dual-pixel PDAF OIS main + underwhelming 12MP 13mm ultrawide setup, average 10MP 23mm selfie, uneven video recording quality, mature and feature packed OneUI with 7 years of OS updates, DeX software and a fast USB-C 3.2 with OTG
CONs
thinner than the 6 but still >13mm, painfully slow >90min 25W (15W wireless) charging, no AF on ultrawide or selfie, no expandable memory, weak stereo speaker setup
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.