Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro+ vs Vivo X200
Verdict
Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro+ and Vivo X200 tie on the OH Rank at a score of 68. Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro+ wins on Performance and Battery; Vivo X200 wins on Screen and Main Camera. Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro+ is 1.7mm wider than Vivo X200. Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro+ is the more recent release, from May 18, 2026.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
68
68
Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro+
76.5mm (3.01in) · May 18, 2026 · Rank #108
13+14+11+12+6+3+3+0+3+3 = 68
* TOP Battery Endurance* TOP Gaming
EDITORIAL: ZTE sub-brand Nubia has been perfecting its gaming-phone Redmagic line, every 6 months. The 11S Pro and Pro+ are their most advanced models differing only in battery size (8000mAh vs 7500mAh), charging speed (80W vs 120W) and a liquid cooling system on the Plus. Both are excellent gaming phones that feature fast screens, very long battery life and top speed performance. Imaging has always been a weakness of Redmagic phones and is not improving. The main and ultrawide lenses heavily process images while the (hidden under screen) selfie images look like they came from 2005. But if imaging is the least important, you should consider these phones.
PROs
excellent and very unique build, record breaking SD 8 Elite Gen 5 with UFS 4.1 performance, >42hr endurance from a 7500mAh Si-C battery with sub-50min 120W (80W wireless) charging, excellent notch-less >1600nits bright 430ppi 144Hz 6.85" AMOLED screen, submersible IPX8 protection, excellent gaming experience with great software and hardware (cooking system, shoulder triggers, responsive screen, headphone jack for better sound), basic desktop replacement functionality with Android 17 update, thin screen bezels, unique body design with LED lights on multiple sides, fast USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 with Display Port
CONs
boxy and 230g heavy, non-LTPO and non-HDR screen (don't take away from excellent experience), no dust protection, reliable 50MP 23mm OIS PDAF main + below average 50MP 13mm AF ultrawide + average 2MP macro setup, very average under-screen 16MP selfie, average (at best) video recording, no memory expansion, just 3 years OS updates
Vivo X200
74.8mm (2.94in) · Oct 2024 · Rank #118
11+11+13+12+12+3+3+0+3+0 = 68
EDITORIAL: Another great effort from Vivo. Downgraded UFS speed, camera and a non-LTPO screen but otherwise very close to Vivo X200 Pro in performance, battery endurance, fast charging and screen quality. Highly recommended it you can get the 512GB version, not available everywhere.
PROs
very fast performance by UFS4.0 and Dimensity 9400, 36hr endurance from a 5800mAh Si/C anode battery with sub-40min 90W charging, >1500nits 460ppi 120Hz OLED screen with HDR10+ and >2000Hz PWM dimming frequency, IP69 protection, excellent 50MP 23mm main + very good 50MP 70mm telephoto (both OIS PDAF) + very good 50MP 15mm ultrawide setup,
CONs
non-LTPO screen locked at 60Hz, 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, average 32MP non-AF selfie, average video recording, no expandable memory, low number of (years of) OS updates, no desktop replacement feature
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.