(Oppo) OnePlus 13s vs Honor 400
Verdict
(Oppo) OnePlus 13s scores higher on the OH Rank (58 vs 57), winning 2 of 10 categories including Performance and Selfie. Honor 400 is 2.9mm wider than (Oppo) OnePlus 13s. (Oppo) OnePlus 13s is the more recent release, from Jun 12, 2025.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
58
57
(Oppo) OnePlus 13s
71.7mm (2.82in) · Jun 12, 2025 · Rank #195
11+8+11+6+9+5+3+0+5+0 = 58
* TOP Software
EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-release and pre-test listing based on reasonable expectations of battery endurance and camera performance) This year, OnePlus joins other Chinese makers in adding a mini-flagship. The 13s could be a bulls eye with top processing and battery endurance, very good screen, AF selfie and 4 years of OS updates. Tests should confirm the charging speed (sub-60min expected) and the main + tele lens performance. Unfortunately, this phone is only IP65 (can't be submerged) and the awesome hardware ring-slider is now replaced with a programmable button.
PROs
great build, great SD 8 Elite with UFS4.0 performance, a full day endurance from a 5850mAh Li-Ion battery with sub-60min fast 80W wired charging (no wireless), ~1200nits 460ppi 120Hz LTPO AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, reliable OIS 50MP main + 50MP tele (both PDAF) back camera, great 32MP selfie with AF, 4 years of OS updates
CONs
flat back-front-and-sides design, lack of wireless charging, just IP65 (splash-resistant) protection, a lack of expandable memory, no desktop replacement functionality
Honor 400
74.6mm (2.94in) · May 23, 2025 · Rank #198
3+11+13+6+12+4+3+0+5+0 = 57
* TOP SoftwareMidrange
EDITORIAL: 6 months after Honor 300 comes a big upgrade: loaded to the brim with cool new AI features in MagicOS 9, a promise of 6 OS updates - on a midranger! A 200MP main and a 50MP ultrawide produce great photos in most conditions and the selfie output is above it's class too. 400 comes with average 7 Gen 3 chip that deliveries very good battery endurance despite lack of LTPO tech and minimally dynamic screen refresh performance.
PROs
attractive design with camera bump reminiscent of Pura phones, good SD 7 Gen 3 with UFS 3.1 performance, >30hr endurance from a 6000mAh Si-C battery (5300mAh in EU) with sub-60min 80W charging (66W in EU), excellent >1500nits bright 460ppi sharp AMOLED screen with HDR10+, very good imaging from a 200MP PDAF main + 50MP AF ultrawide, very good 50MP selfie, excellent & feature rich (AI and otherwise) MagicOS with a promise of 6 years of updates
CONs
plastic frame, no LTPO, screen refresh performance is very basic, only IP65 (no water immersion) protection, poor ultrawide video recording performance, no expandable memory or desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0 port (tho has OTG)
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.