OnePlus 13T vs (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro
Verdict
OnePlus 13T and (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro tie on the OH Rank at a score of 62. OnePlus 13T wins on Performance and Main Camera; (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro wins on Screen and IP Protection. (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro is 4.5mm wider than OnePlus 13T. (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro is the more recent release, from Jul 30, 2025.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
62
62
OnePlus 13T
71.7mm (2.82in) · Apr 2025 · Rank #159
11+11+11+6+12+3+3+0+5+0 = 62
FLY* TOP Software
EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-test listing based on reasonable expectation of battery, screen and imaging performance) Following this year's tend, OnePlus is also releasing a "mini". Their version could be a real hit with a top processor, Silicone Carbon aided battery and fast charging, a great 6.3" screen, IP69 protection and a very good camera setup. Limited to China but sold in India as OnePlus 13S.
PROs
compact flagship quality build, fast SD 8 Elite with UFS4.0 performance, 36hr endurance from a 6260mAh Si/C battery with 80W wired charging, efficient 450ppi 120Hz LTPO AMOLED with Dolby Vision screen, very good photos from 50MP OIS PDAF main + 50MP 50mm PDAF telefoto, 4 years of mature OS
CONs
<1300nits brightness on otherwise excellent screen, only IP65 protection, no ultrawide lens, 16MP selfie with no AF, average video recording, no SDmemory, no desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0
(Oppo) Realme 15 Pro
76.2mm (3in) · Jul 30, 2025 · Rank #155
3+11+13+15+9+4+4+0+3+0 = 62
* TOP ProtectionMidrange
EDITORIAL: Oppo's sub-brand Realme comes with a very capable midranger that you should know about. It offers good performance, great battery endurance, 144Hz refresh bright screen with all the works, above average tripple-50MP imaging setup (lacks advanced software processing) and attractive build that was considered premium a few years ago. The compromises are short(er) OS support, lack of wireless charging and not-so-loud stereo speaker setup.
PROs
good build, good SD 7 Gen 4 with UFS 3.1 performance, close to 42hr endurance from a 7000mAh lithium battery (there is a Si-C battery version with even longer endurance) with sub-60min 80W charging, high quality >1800nits bright 450ppi OLED screen with HDR10+ and >4000Hz PWM dimming rate, IP69 protection with added Military standard impact protection, very good imaging from a 50MP 24mm OIS PDAF main + better then average 50MP 16mm ultrawide setup, good 50MP 22mm fixed focus selfie, above average video recording
CONs
big and hard to handle with one hand, lack of wireless charging, some image processing missteps, some inconsistencies in video recording, only 3 years of updates of mature and stable OS, weaker speaker setup then the competition
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.