Oppo Find X7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro

Verdict

Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro tie on the OH Rank at a score of 68. Oppo Find X7 Ultra wins on Screen and Main Camera; Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro wins on Battery and Video. Oppo Find X7 Ultra is 1mm wider than Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro. Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro is the more recent release, from Mar 17, 2026.

Score Breakdown

Category

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

76.2mm (3in) · Jan 2024 · Rank #107

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro

75.2mm (2.96in) · Mar 17, 2026 · Rank #97
Performance /15
9
9
Battery /15
9
14
Screen /15
13
11
IP Protection /15
12
12
Main Camera /15
12
9
Selfie /5
5
4
Video /5
3
4
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
5
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
0
TOTAL
68
68
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
76.2mm (3in) · Jan 2024 · Rank #107
9+9+13+12+12+5+3+0+5+0 = 68

EDITORIAL: Oppo’s top phone of 2024 is s still a great package with amazing photography chops and a top build.

PROs
if you can still find it (no pun intended): still fast SD 8 Gen 3 performance with UFS4.0, sub-30min (0-100%) fast charging, a >510 ppi with Dolby Vision screen, 1″ main sensor, excellent photos from the back quad 50MP PDAF setup with OIS on all except ultrawide and front a great selfie (32MP PDAF)
CONs
221gr heavy, only 1-day battery endurance, inconsistent video quality across lenses (the main lens videos are outstanding) (updated Apr 23, 2025)
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
75.2mm (2.96in) · Mar 17, 2026 · Rank #97
9+14+11+12+9+4+4+0+5+0 = 68
* TOP Battery Endurance* TOP SoftwareMidrange

EDITORIAL: 14 months after X7 Pro comes a meaningful upgrade with a metal frame, faster performance and real endurance increase. The imaging setup is largely unchanged: an excellent main camera and a 8MP ultrawide with no-AF. Ironman variant is still there too.

PROs
good build with aluminum frame, excellent Dimesity 8500 Ultra with UFS 4.1 performance, 42hr endurance from a 6500mAh Si-C battery with 40min 100W charging, ~1100nits 460ppi 120Hz AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision and very high PWM dimming rate, IP69 protection, excellent 50MP 26mm OIS PDAF main + average 8MP 15mm ultrawide, very good 20MP 21mm selfie, stabile and feature rich HyperOS with 4 years of updates, great value on release
CONs
no wireless charging, screen not as bright as advertised and with limited refresh rate options, no expandable memory, no desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0 port (with OTG)

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.