Oppo Reno 13 Pro vs (Xiaomi) Poco F7
Verdict
Oppo Reno 13 Pro and (Xiaomi) Poco F7 tie on the OH Rank at a score of 59. Oppo Reno 13 Pro wins on Main Camera and Selfie; (Xiaomi) Poco F7 wins on Performance and Screen. (Xiaomi) Poco F7 is 1.3mm wider than Oppo Reno 13 Pro. (Xiaomi) Poco F7 is the more recent release, from Jun 24, 2025.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
59
59
Oppo Reno 13 Pro
76.6mm (3.02in) · Nov 29, 2024 · Rank #189
3+11+11+12+12+4+3+0+3+0 = 59
Midrange
EDITORIAL: Top of Oppo's midrange Reno line, 13 Pro comes with a slightly better chip, a bigger battery and full water proofing but loses the SD memory expansion shoot that made Reno midrangers stand out as true value in the phone market.
PROs
aluminum and glass build, good Dimensity 8350 with UFS 3.1 performance, >30hr endurance from a 5800mAh battery with sub-50min 80W (China gets 50W wireless too) charging, 1100nits 450ppi AMOLED screen with HDR10+, IP69 (down to 2m for 30min) water protection, good pics from a 50MP 24mm main + 50MP 85mm telephoto (both OIS PDAF) + 8MP 15mm ultrawide setup, very good 50MP 21mm selfie with AF
CONs
almost 2mm wider and 15g heavier then Reno 12 Pro, no AF on ultrawide, mediocre video recording, the SD memory is gone, less then 4 years of OS updates, no desktop replacement functionality and a slow USB-C 2.0 port (with OTG)
(Xiaomi) Poco F7
77.9mm (3.07in) · Jun 24, 2025 · Rank #186
9+11+13+12+6+3+0+0+5+0 = 59
Midrange
EDITORIAL: F7 marks a big change in Poco's direction - the phone grew significantly in size (now 3mm wider), battery and screen. Numbers doubled for PWM dimming frequency, improved for screen brightness, jumped 25% in compound performance tests. Imaging remained the same: a capable but very limited 2 lens setup in the back and a sans-AF selfie. The build is better (but heavier: 180g to 215g) with a IP68 and a aluminum frame instead of plastic.
PROs
better physical build, very good SD 8s Gen 4 with UFS 4.1 performance, >30hr endurance from a 6500mAh battery (7500mAh in India) with sub-60min fast 90W charging, >1500nits bright 450ppi AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, IP68 protection, stabile and feature rich HyperOS with a 4 year update promise
CONs
almost 80mm wide, afterthought imaging with an okay 50MP 26mm OIS PDAF main + unpredictable 8MP 15mm ultrawide, average 20MP 21mm sans-AF selfie, unreliable video recording, no expandable memory slot or desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0 port (tho has OTG)
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.