Oppo Reno 14 Pro vs (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro

Verdict

Oppo Reno 14 Pro and (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro tie on the OH Rank at a score of 62. Oppo Reno 14 Pro wins on Performance and Main Camera; (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro wins on Screen and IP Protection. Oppo Reno 14 Pro is 0.8mm wider than (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro. (Oppo) Realme 15 Pro is the more recent release, from Jul 30, 2025.

Score Breakdown

Category

Oppo Reno 14 Pro

77mm (3.03in) · May 2025 · Rank #166

(Oppo) Realme 15 Pro

76.2mm (3in) · Jul 30, 2025 · Rank #155
Performance /15
5
3
Battery /15
11
11
Screen /15
11
13
IP Protection /15
12
15
Main Camera /15
12
9
Selfie /5
5
4
Video /5
3
4
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
3
3
Desktop Replacement /5
0
0
TOTAL
62
62
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
77mm (3.03in) · May 2025 · Rank #166
5+11+11+12+12+5+3+0+3+0 = 62
* TOP SelfieMidrange

EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-test listing based on a reasonable expectation of battery endurance, screen and camera performance) Reno 14 Pro is an iterative update of Reno 13 Pro. Slightly wider, thinner and heavier, it features a new (slightly faster) chip, slightly bigger battery but camera gets 2 major updates: a periscope telephoto and a proper 50MP ultrawide. Reno remains one of the best midrange (chip) phones.

PROs
complete package at a good price, solid Dimensity 8450 with UFS 3.1 performance, excellent sub-42hr endurance from a 6200mAh battery with 80W (50W wireless) fast charging, large bright AMOLED with HDR10+ and 3800+PWM, IP69 (2m for up to 30 min) protection, great pics from 50MP 24mm main + 50MP 80mm periscope telephoto (both with OIS PDAF) + 50MP 16mm AF ultrawide, good 50MP AF selfie
CONs
hard to use one-hand, bland looks, average video recording, removed SDmemory option Reno phones used to include, short OS update policy, no desktop replacement functionality or even video-out
(Oppo) Realme 15 Pro
76.2mm (3in) · Jul 30, 2025 · Rank #155
3+11+13+15+9+4+4+0+3+0 = 62
* TOP ProtectionMidrange

EDITORIAL: Oppo's sub-brand Realme comes with a very capable midranger that you should know about. It offers good performance, great battery endurance, 144Hz refresh bright screen with all the works, above average tripple-50MP imaging setup (lacks advanced software processing) and attractive build that was considered premium a few years ago. The compromises are short(er) OS support, lack of wireless charging and not-so-loud stereo speaker setup.

PROs
good build, good SD 7 Gen 4 with UFS 3.1 performance, close to 42hr endurance from a 7000mAh lithium battery (there is a Si-C battery version with even longer endurance) with sub-60min 80W charging, high quality >1800nits bright 450ppi OLED screen with HDR10+ and >4000Hz PWM dimming rate, IP69 protection with added Military standard impact protection, very good imaging from a 50MP 24mm OIS PDAF main + better then average 50MP 16mm ultrawide setup, good 50MP 22mm fixed focus selfie, above average video recording
CONs
big and hard to handle with one hand, lack of wireless charging, some image processing missteps, some inconsistencies in video recording, only 3 years of updates of mature and stable OS, weaker speaker setup then the competition

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.