Oppo Reno 16 vs (Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro
Verdict
Oppo Reno 16 and (Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro tie on the OH Rank at a score of 64. Oppo Reno 16 wins on Battery and Main Camera; (Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro wins on Performance and Screen. (Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro is 2.8mm wider than Oppo Reno 16. Oppo Reno 16 is the more recent release, from Jul 9, 2026.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
64
64
Oppo Reno 16
72.4mm (2.85in) · Jul 9, 2026 · Rank #148
3+13+11+12+12+5+3+0+5+0 = 64
* TOP Battery Endurance* TOP Selfie* TOP SoftwareMidrange
EDITORIAL: Oppo's Reno family of midrangers update every 6 months and keep getting better and better (and the price keeps going higher and higher, now to almost flagship level). What you get this time is a lovely and 2mm narrower body with the same Qualcomm processor, bigger battery (smaller in EU), 4 AF-capable lenses, AI button and 5 years of OS updates. Photography is improved, video recording at average.
PROs
compact-like size, great build, good SD 7 Gen 4 with UFS 3.1 performance, >42hr endurance from a 6700mAn (6000 in EU) Si-C battery with >60min 80W charging, sub-1200nits 460ppi 120Hz AMOLED screen with HDR10+ and very high PWM dimming, IP69 protection, very good pics from a 50MP 26mm OIS main + 50MP 80mm OIS tele (both with PDAF) + 50MP 16mm AF ultrawide setup, excellent 50MP 18mm AF selfie, average video recording, 5 years of updates of mature and feature rich ColorOS, dedicated AI button
CONs
just shy of 72mm wide "Compact" lable, a 16 month old midrange chip may be hard to justify in this price range, slow charging time for a 80W charging speed, sub-ideal (1300nits) brightness & lack of LTPO on otherwise excellent screen, no expandable storage, no desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0 port (tho it has OTG)
(Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro
75.2mm (2.96in) · Jan 2025 · Rank #151
9+8+15+12+9+3+3+0+5+0 = 64
PROs
fast SD 8 Gen 3 UFS4.1 performance, full day 6000mAh Li/P battery + 90W sub-40min charging, 1500nits >520ppi 3840PWM AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, IP68, reliable pics and videos from 50MP OIS PDAF main + 8MP ultrawide back cameras, 4 years of OS updates, good build and price
CONs
lack of 2-day endurance, mediocre ultrawide camera imaging , no tele lense, no SDmemory, no video out or desktop replacement feature (updated Jun 10, 2025)
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.