(Xiaomi) Poco F7 vs (Oppo) OnePlus 13s
Verdict
(Xiaomi) Poco F7 scores higher on the OH Rank (59 vs 58), winning 3 of 10 categories including Battery and Screen. (Xiaomi) Poco F7 is 6.2mm wider than (Oppo) OnePlus 13s. (Xiaomi) Poco F7 is the more recent release, from Jun 24, 2025.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
59
58
(Xiaomi) Poco F7
77.9mm (3.07in) · Jun 24, 2025 · Rank #186
9+11+13+12+6+3+0+0+5+0 = 59
Midrange
EDITORIAL: F7 marks a big change in Poco's direction - the phone grew significantly in size (now 3mm wider), battery and screen. Numbers doubled for PWM dimming frequency, improved for screen brightness, jumped 25% in compound performance tests. Imaging remained the same: a capable but very limited 2 lens setup in the back and a sans-AF selfie. The build is better (but heavier: 180g to 215g) with a IP68 and a aluminum frame instead of plastic.
PROs
better physical build, very good SD 8s Gen 4 with UFS 4.1 performance, >30hr endurance from a 6500mAh battery (7500mAh in India) with sub-60min fast 90W charging, >1500nits bright 450ppi AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, IP68 protection, stabile and feature rich HyperOS with a 4 year update promise
CONs
almost 80mm wide, afterthought imaging with an okay 50MP 26mm OIS PDAF main + unpredictable 8MP 15mm ultrawide, average 20MP 21mm sans-AF selfie, unreliable video recording, no expandable memory slot or desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0 port (tho has OTG)
(Oppo) OnePlus 13s
71.7mm (2.82in) · Jun 12, 2025 · Rank #195
11+8+11+6+9+5+3+0+5+0 = 58
* TOP Software
EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-release and pre-test listing based on reasonable expectations of battery endurance and camera performance) This year, OnePlus joins other Chinese makers in adding a mini-flagship. The 13s could be a bulls eye with top processing and battery endurance, very good screen, AF selfie and 4 years of OS updates. Tests should confirm the charging speed (sub-60min expected) and the main + tele lens performance. Unfortunately, this phone is only IP65 (can't be submerged) and the awesome hardware ring-slider is now replaced with a programmable button.
PROs
great build, great SD 8 Elite with UFS4.0 performance, a full day endurance from a 5850mAh Li-Ion battery with sub-60min fast 80W wired charging (no wireless), ~1200nits 460ppi 120Hz LTPO AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, reliable OIS 50MP main + 50MP tele (both PDAF) back camera, great 32MP selfie with AF, 4 years of OS updates
CONs
flat back-front-and-sides design, lack of wireless charging, just IP65 (splash-resistant) protection, a lack of expandable memory, no desktop replacement functionality
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.