(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro vs Vivo X200 FE

Verdict

(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro and Vivo X200 FE tie on the OH Rank at a score of 68. (Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro wins on Performance and Battery; Vivo X200 FE wins on Main Camera and Selfie. (Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro is 5.1mm wider than Vivo X200 FE. Vivo X200 FE is the more recent release, from Jul 2025.

Score Breakdown

Category

(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro

76.9mm (3.03in) · Nov 2024 · Rank #109

Vivo X200 FE

71.8mm (2.83in) · Jul 2025 · Rank #105
Performance /15
11
7
Battery /15
14
11
Screen /15
13
13
IP Protection /15
12
12
Main Camera /15
9
12
Selfie /5
3
5
Video /5
3
3
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
3
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
0
TOTAL
68
68
(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro
76.9mm (3.03in) · Nov 2024 · Rank #109
11+14+13+12+9+3+3+0+3+0 = 68

EDITORIAL: Vivo focuses on a “battery-screen-cameras” for it’s success, (Oppo) Realme is going for the “processor-battery-screen” approach. I expected the top performance here but didn’t see how amazing phone’s battery could be. Not only does it last longer than competition, GT 7 Pro also charges 50% in just 12 minutes! It’s 120W charging is also smarter this year with various options for preserving battery health. And the charger comes in the box to shows us what’s possible on the battery front. The triple lens main camera produces good photos.

PROs
SD 8 Elite with UFS4.0 performance, outstanding 6500mAh Silicone battery life with sub-1hr 120W charging, a super bright >2000nits 1264p screen with Dolby Vision, IP69 protection, ultrasonic biometrics
CONs
average camera performance, no SDmemory, only 3 years of OS updates, no desktop replacement software (updated Apr 18, 2025)
Vivo X200 FE
71.8mm (2.83in) · Jul 2025 · Rank #105
7+11+13+12+12+5+3+0+5+0 = 68
FLY* TOP Software* TOP Selfie

EDITORIAL: 8 months after X200 Pro Mini here comes another compact Vivo. Along with Oppo and Xiaomi, Vivo is now clearly after Apple's compact phones profits. This phone looks and feels similar to iPhones falling somewhere in between iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 but delivering clean Android, much better battery life and faster charging.

PROs
very good build, fast Dimensity 9300+ with UFS3.1 performance, >36hr endurance from a 6500mAh Si-C battery with sub-60min fast 90W wired charging, bright >1700nits HDR10+ LTPO AMOLED screen, IP69 element protection, great photos from the 50MP 23mm PDAF main + 50MP 70mm OIS PDAF periscope telephoto (but not) 8MP 15mm ultrawide camera, excellent selfies from a 50MP AF unit, up to 4 years of OS updates
CONs
no AF on the 8MP ultrawide, no expandable storage, no desktop replacement feature, slow USB-C 2.0 port with no video out

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.