(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro vs Vivo X200
Verdict
(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro and Vivo X200 tie on the OH Rank at a score of 68. (Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro wins on Battery; Vivo X200 wins on Main Camera. (Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro is 2.1mm wider than Vivo X200. (Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro is the more recent release, from Nov 2024.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
68
68
(Oppo) Realme GT 7 Pro
76.9mm (3.03in) · Nov 2024 · Rank #109
11+14+13+12+9+3+3+0+3+0 = 68
EDITORIAL: Vivo focuses on a âbattery-screen-camerasâ for itâs success, (Oppo) Realme is going for the âprocessor-battery-screenâ approach. I expected the top performance here but didnât see how amazing phoneâs battery could be. Not only does it last longer than competition, GT 7 Pro also charges 50% in just 12 minutes! Itâs 120W charging is also smarter this year with various options for preserving battery health. And the charger comes in the box to shows us whatâs possible on the battery front. The triple lens main camera produces good photos.
PROs
SD 8 Elite with UFS4.0 performance, outstanding 6500mAh Silicone battery life with sub-1hr 120W charging, a super bright >2000nits 1264p screen with Dolby Vision, IP69 protection, ultrasonic biometrics
CONs
average camera performance, no SDmemory, only 3 years of OS updates, no desktop replacement software (updated Apr 18, 2025)
Vivo X200
74.8mm (2.94in) · Oct 2024 · Rank #106
11+11+13+12+12+3+3+0+3+0 = 68
FLY
EDITORIAL: Another great effort from Vivo. Downgraded UFS speed, camera and a non-LTPO screen but otherwise very close to Vivo X200 Pro in performance, battery endurance, fast charging and screen quality. Highly recommended it you can get the 512GB version, not available everywhere.
PROs
very fast performance by UFS4.0 and Dimensity 9400, 36hr endurance from a 5800mAh Si/C anode battery with sub-40min 90W charging, >1500nits 460ppi 120Hz OLED screen with HDR10+ and >2000Hz PWM dimming frequency, IP69 protection, excellent 50MP 23mm main + very good 50MP 70mm telephoto (both OIS PDAF) + very good 50MP 15mm ultrawide setup,
CONs
non-LTPO screen locked at 60Hz, 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, average 32MP non-AF selfie, average video recording, no expandable memory, low number of (years of) OS updates, no desktop replacement feature
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.