Sony Xperia 10 VII vs Samsung Galaxy A37
Verdict
Sony Xperia 10 VII scores higher on the OH Rank (44 vs 42), winning 2 of 10 categories including Screen and SD Memory. Samsung Galaxy A37 is 6.2mm wider than Sony Xperia 10 VII. Samsung Galaxy A37 is the more recent release, from Apr 9, 2026.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
44
42
Sony Xperia 10 VII
72mm (2.83in) · Sep 19, 2025 · Rank #247
1+6+9+12+3+3+0+5+5+0 = 44
* TOP Software* TOP Memory ExpansionMidrange
EDITORIAL: Sony's mobile division has seen one of the worst transformations over the last decade. Going from inventing the first submersible phone, first compact flagship and first notchless screen (among other things), Sony crashed to a lack of basic software work, low quality imaging and finally: abandonment of what they championed as truly better mobile phone solutions (the 21:9 screen aspect ratio, narrow-and-easy-to-handle 68mm bodies, excellent battery life long before its Chinese rivals). Today, Xperia 10 VII looks embarrassing with its utter lack of excellence in any single department (except for the Micro SD slot).
PROs
light and relatively compact, okay SD 6 Gen 3 with UFS 3.0 performance, IP68 protection, SD memory expansion, 4 years of stabile stock-like Android, fast USB-C 3.0 port
CONs
plastic back, just 24hr endurance from a 5000mAh lithium battery with >100min slow wired charging, big chunky bezels on a sub-1300nits 420ppi 120Hz OLED screen with no variable refresh rate or HDR10+, occasional good image from a 50MP 24mm PDAF main + 12MP 16mm non-AF ultrawide setup, no AF on a basic 8MP 26mm selfie, unreliable video recording, disappointing direction and concerns over Sony's mobile division future
Samsung Galaxy A37
78.2mm (3.08in) · Apr 9, 2026 · Rank #249
1+7+5+12+6+3+3+0+5+0 = 42
* TOP SoftwareMidrange
EDITORIAL: Like the rest of Samsung's 2026, the A37 suffers from lack of inspiration - it seems it is build to be "just enough" of an upgrade and not to threaten Samsung's better devices. Compared to A57, it is just-so lower in raw performance, battery endurance and charging speed, screen brightness and ultrawide performance. Problem is, with A56 being so much better, that 1 year old phone is a cheaper and an obvious choice over the A37. And so are midrangers from Xiaomi, Vivo, Oppo and Nothing. Samsung is betting their 6 year long OS support policy combined with global service, advanced AI integration and well developed ecosystem will carry A37 to "just enough" sales numbers.
PROs
well built, all-day (sub-30hr) endurance from a 5000mAh lithium battery with >70min 45W charging, IP68 protection, good 50MP 23mm OIS PDAF main camera imaging, average 12MP 25mm selfie, 6 years of stabile and AI feature rich OneUI
CONs
very wide, big screen bezels, the Exynos 1480 with UFS 3.1 may not be able to carry 6 years of OS updates, could-be-better sub-1300nits brightness sub-400 pixel density 120Hz Super AMOLED screen with no HDR and minimal refresh rate variability, below-par and sans-AF 8MP 16mm ultrawide + 8MP 25mm macro performance, poor video performance (main camera is okay), no expandable memory or desktop replacement functionality, slow USB-C 2.0 port
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.