Vivo V60 vs (Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro

Verdict

Vivo V60 scores higher on the OH Rank (65 vs 64), winning 4 of 10 categories including Battery and Main Camera. Vivo V60 is 1.8mm wider than (Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro. Vivo V60 is the more recent release, from Aug 2025.

Score Breakdown

Category

Vivo V60

77mm (3.03in) · Aug 2025 · Rank #147

(Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro

75.2mm (2.96in) · Jan 2025 · Rank #151
Performance /15
3
9
Battery /15
14
8
Screen /15
10
15
IP Protection /15
12
12
Main Camera /15
12
9
Selfie /5
5
3
Video /5
4
3
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
5
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
0
TOTAL
65
64
Vivo V60
77mm (3.03in) · Aug 2025 · Rank #147
3+14+10+12+12+5+4+0+5+0 = 65
* TOP MidrangerMidrange

EDITORIAL: Vivo’s V series delivers some of the best midrange phones. While always playing on the battery+screen+imaging formula the V60 brings the first periscope telephoto to a V series phone. It is excellent. The battery endurance remains class leading, a true 2-day performance. Along the 4 Zaiss tuned cameras (3 with AF) you also get a large, bright screen. The Funtouch OS is stable and mature, easy to use and like but the screen has grown in size while dropping to 1080p. Overall, V 60 is a joy to use and it’s main, periscope telephoto and selfie cameras are hard to beat.

PROs
good SnapDragon 7 Gen 4 with UFS 2.2 performance, outstanding endurance of the 6500mAh Si-C battery with sub-1hr 90W wired charging, bright >1300nits AMOLED HDR10+ screen with high frequency PWM, IP69 protection, Zeiss branded 50MP OIS main + 50MP OIS periscope telephoto (both with PDAF), great 50MP AF selfie, 4 years of OS updates
CONs
wider and harder to use one hand, only 388ppi screen, 8MP ultrawide with no AF, no SDmemory, no desktop replacement feature or even video out, slow USB-C 2.0 port
(Xiaomi) Poco F7 Pro
75.2mm (2.96in) · Jan 2025 · Rank #151
9+8+15+12+9+3+3+0+5+0 = 64
PROs
fast SD 8 Gen 3 UFS4.1 performance, full day 6000mAh Li/P battery + 90W sub-40min charging, 1500nits >520ppi 3840PWM AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, IP68, reliable pics and videos from 50MP OIS PDAF main + 8MP ultrawide back cameras, 4 years of OS updates, good build and price
CONs
lack of 2-day endurance, mediocre ultrawide camera imaging , no tele lense, no SDmemory, no video out or desktop replacement feature (updated Jun 10, 2025)

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.