Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X300 FE
Verdict
Vivo X200 Pro and Vivo X300 FE tie on the OH Rank at a score of 72. Vivo X200 Pro wins on Main Camera; Vivo X300 FE wins on Selfie. Vivo X200 Pro is 4.2mm wider than Vivo X300 FE. Vivo X300 FE is the more recent release, from Apr 29, 2026.
Score Breakdown
Performance /15
Battery /15
Screen /15
IP Protection /15
Main Camera /15
Selfie /5
Video /5
SD Memory /5
Software /5
Desktop Replacement /5
TOTAL
72
72
Vivo X200 Pro
76mm (2.99in) · Oct 19, 2024 · Rank #67
11+11+13+12+14+3+3+0+5+0 = 72
FLY* TOP Battery Endurance* TOP Software
EDITORIAL: One of the best 2024 camera phones owes its reputation to computational photography, Zeiss optics and excellent 200MP 3.7zoom periscope telephoto with OIS and multi-directional PDAF. This phone set a new standard for phone photography topping most lists in 2024.
PROs
flagship quality built, excellent Dimensity 9400 with UFS 4.0 performance, 36+hr endurance from a 6000mAh Si battery with sub-50min 90W charging (30W wireless). >1800nits bright 450ppi LTPO AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, IP69 protection. outstanding photography from Zeiss optics equipped 50MP main + 200MP 3.7zoom periscope telephoto (both with PDAF OIS) + 50MP AF ultrawide, good selfies from a 32MP front camera, reliable video recording, up to 4 years of OS updates
CONs
not globally available, no AF on selfie, no SDmemory slot nor desktop replacement feature
Vivo X300 FE
71.8mm (2.83in) · Apr 29, 2026 · Rank #63
11+11+13+12+12+5+3+0+5+0 = 72
* TOP Selfie* TOP Software
EDITORIAL: Vivo brought minor updates to it's first compact flagship, X200 FE and this one too is very easy to like. It is a excellent all-rounder providing great performance, a day and a half endurance, wonderful screen, some excellent photos and offering a great stabile and attractive software experience. It doesn't excel at anything but does everything well and in the small world of compacts, this means a lot.
PROs
flagship build, fast SD 8 Gen 5 with UFS 4.0 performance, 36hr endurance from a 6500mAh Si-C battery with sub-50min 90W (40W wireless) charging, >1700nits 460ppi 120Hz LTPO AMOLED screen with HDR10+, IP69 protection, ZEISS lenses 50MP 23mm OIS PDAF main + 50MP 73mm OIS PDAF telephoto + 8MP 15mm setup with very good all around performance, excellent 50MP 20mm PDAF selfie, up to 5 years of OS updates
CONs
no AF on 8MP ultrawide, average video recording, no expandable memory, AI features lag behind the best, no desktop replacement (tho it does ofer screen mirroring), slow USB-C 2.0 (there is OTG)
Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.
Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.