Vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17

Verdict

Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 tie on the OH Rank at a score of 78. Vivo X200 Ultra wins on Screen and Main Camera; Xiaomi 17 wins on Performance and Battery. Vivo X200 Ultra is 5mm wider than Xiaomi 17. Xiaomi 17 is the more recent release, from Sep 27, 2025.

Score Breakdown

Category

Vivo X200 Ultra

76.8mm (3.02in) · Apr 29, 2025 · Rank #29

Xiaomi 17

71.8mm (2.83in) · Sep 27, 2025 · Rank #28
Performance /15
11
13
Battery /15
11
14
Screen /15
15
11
IP Protection /15
12
12
Main Camera /15
14
12
Selfie /5
5
4
Video /5
5
4
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
5
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
3
TOTAL
78
78
Vivo X200 Ultra
76.8mm (3.02in) · Apr 29, 2025 · Rank #29
11+11+15+12+14+5+5+0+5+0 = 78
BEST Phone Spring Summer 2025FLY* TOP Screen* TOP Selfie* TOP Software* TOP Camera

EDITORIAL: Eagerly anticipated Vivo X200 Ultra came with the top hardware and very mature photo and video processing. It improved on the amazing X200 Pro with UFS 4.1, higher pixel density screen, OIS PDAF on all of its back lenses, AF selfie and a dedicated iPhone-like photo hardware slider. An amazing smartphone if you don't care for its big size and heft. It also has an extensive optional camera accessories package that adds controls, battery, and telephoto skills.

PROs
top Snapdragon 8 Elite with UFS 4.1 performance, >30hr endurance from a 6000mAh silicone anode battery with 90W sub-50min 90W (40W wireless) charging, excellent 510ppi >1800nits Dolby Vision LTPO AMOLED screen, IP69 protection, top imaging from 50MP 35mm main + 200MP 85mm periscope + 50MP 14mm ultrawide (all with OIS PDAF) back camera with an optional add-on 200mm zoom lens, a 50MP AF selfie, very good video recording, up to 4 years of OS updates, fast USB-C 3.2 with Display Port and OTG
CONs
229g heavy, massive camera bump, still no expandable memory or desktop replacement feature
Xiaomi 17
71.8mm (2.83in) · Sep 27, 2025 · Rank #28
13+14+11+12+12+4+4+0+5+3 = 78
FLY* TOP Compact* TOP Battery Endurance* TOP Software

EDITORIAL: Xiaomi is going after Apple this year with matching gen number and addition of Pro and Pro Max models. Plain 17 adds a massive battery upgrade (from 5500 to 7000mAh, 6330mAh in EU), faster processor and storage, better selfie (finally with AF) and Dolby Atmos certified speakers. It is a battery endurance beast, providing 42+ hours to even a heavy user. Cameras are similar to excellent Xiaomi 15: competent performer with some excellent results. Apple flattery extended to physical design too - while last year's model was one of the nicest to hold because of softly curved front and back glass panels, the 17 has palm-cutting sharp frame with flat front and back.

PROs
compact, fast SD 8 Elite Gen 5 with UFS 4.1 performance, 48hr endurance from 7000mAh (6330mAh in EU) battery with sub-50min 100W charging (50W wireless). 460ppi LTPO AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision and >2100 PWM dimming, IP68 protection. excellent photo and video recording from a 50MP OIS PDAF main & tele cameras + 50MP ultrawide, great 50MP PDAF selfie, 6 years of OS updates, basic desktop replacement functionality baked into Android 17, fast USB-C 3.2 with Display Port and OTG
CONs
dim >1100nits screen, still no AF on ultrawide camera, no SDmemory, no desktop replacement feature

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.