Xiaomi 15S Pro vs Motorola Edge (2026)

Verdict

Xiaomi 15S Pro scores higher on the OH Rank (72 vs 71), winning 2 of 10 categories including Performance and Screen. Xiaomi 15S Pro is 3.3mm wider than Motorola Edge (2026). Motorola Edge (2026) is the more recent release, from Jun 11, 2026.

Score Breakdown

Category

Xiaomi 15S Pro

75.3mm (2.96in) · May 22, 2025 · Rank #65

Motorola Edge (2026)

72mm (2.83in) · Jun 11, 2026 · Rank #75
Performance /15
11
3
Battery /15
11
11
Screen /15
15
13
IP Protection /15
12
15
Main Camera /15
12
12
Selfie /5
3
5
Video /5
3
4
SD Memory /5
0
0
Software /5
5
5
Desktop Replacement /5
0
3
TOTAL
72
71
Xiaomi 15S Pro
75.3mm (2.96in) · May 22, 2025 · Rank #65
11+11+15+12+12+3+3+0+5+0 = 72
FLY* TOP Software

EDITORIAL: Featuring Xiaomi's own processor, the 15S Pro marks a beginning of a new era. Unlike Huawei's Kirin chips, the new XRing 01 is a proper 3nm top-of-the-line processor that should compete head on with SD 8 Elite and Mediatec's top Dimensity 9400. Xiaomi wants to impress: all-day battery, excellent screen, powerful cameras, even the Display Port is there.

PROs
expect fast performance with UFS 4.1 memory, >30hr endurance from a 6100mAh Si battery with sub-60min 90W (50W wireless) charging, >1300 >520ppi LTPO AMOLED with Dolby Vision screen, IP68 protection, reliable 50MP 23mm main + 50MP 120mm periscope telephoto (both OIS PDAF)+ 50MP 14mm AF ultrawide setup, average 32MP 22mm (non AF) selfie, okay video recording, 4 years of OS updates and fast USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port with DisplayPort and OTG
CONs
no AF on selfie, no expandable memory or desktop replacement functionality
Motorola Edge (2026)
72mm (2.83in) · Jun 11, 2026 · Rank #75
3+11+13+15+12+5+4+0+5+3 = 71
* TOP Software* TOP Midranger* TOP ProtectionMidrange

EDITORIAL: (this is a pre-test listing based on reasonable expectation of battery, charging and imaging tech) Motorola is happy to try different things and it's middle model has shifted size and target audience a lot: from 7.9mm thickness 2 versions ago, to 6mm in the last iteration, to now back to standard (7.2mm) thickness. The build remains excellent and includes full protection from dropps and elements. Screen is bright and sharp, camera improved with addition of a tele lenses and PDAF to selfie.

PROs
very good build, good Dimensity 7450 with UFS 3.1 performance, >30hr endurance from a 5000mAh Si-C battery with sub-60min 68W (15W wireless) charging, >1400nits bright 460ppi 120Hz AMOLED screen with HDR10+ with very thin bezels, full IP69 with military standard impact protection, very reliable 50MP 24mm OIS main + 10MP 73mm OIS telephoto + 50MP 12mm ultrawide (all with PDAF) back setup, very good 50MP 21mm PDAF selfie, very good video recording, 4 years of stabile and feature rich stock-like Hello OS and a basic desktop replacement functionality, AI button
CONs
frame is plastic again, low frequency PWM dimming on a non-LTPO screen, no expandable memory, slow USB-C 2.0 port (tho has OTG)

Both phones here were scored by me, using the same ten categories, with no ads, sponsorships, or manufacturer relationships — this comparison is as objective and honest as it gets.

Visit Home page to compare world's best phones. You can see scoring and ranking explained on the About page.